Legal Opinion
Bridgeport Jai Alai, Inc. v. Gaming Policy Board
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 12, 1985No. 3042PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff in this appeal, Bridgeport Jai Alai, Inc. (Bridgeport), claims error in the trial court’s decision upholding the determination of jai alai dates by the gaming policy board. The defendant cross appeals contesting the court’s decision that the plaintiff had a right to appeal. We do not reach the merits of either the appeal or the cross appeal because both are moot.
On October 19, 1983, the gaming policy board conducted a hearing to assign dates during which the three jai alai frontons in Connecticut could operate in 1984. On that date, the board set dates that Bridgeport alleges…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Connecticut Foundry Co. v. International Ladies Garment Workers UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Phaneuf v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Young v. TynanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Harkins v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hall v. Dichello Distributors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- D'Agostino v. City of New BritainConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Evergreen Manor Associates v. FarrellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Yankee Sailing Co. v. Yankee Harbor Marina, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985