United States v. Wiggins
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Senior Judge:
The issue presented for our resolution is as follows:
ABSENT A FACTUAL BASIS ESTABLISHING THAT APPELLANT WAS FOUND SLEEPING ON POST, WERE HIS PLEAS OF GUILTY TO CHARGE III AND ITS SPECIFICATION PROPERLY ACCEPTED BY THE MILITARY JUDGE? 1
*598The Court specified this issue based upon the following exchange during the providence inquiry:
MJ: Now, at 0345 on 11 October 1990, were you found sleeping on post?
ACC: Sir, what happened exactly with the fire watch, at 0345 this PFC [appellant] was supposed to wake the next fire watch up. This PFC [appellant] took a seat on two foot lockers…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. MaioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. McCauleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. BurkeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954