Legal Opinion

Vermont Supreme Court Administrative Directive No. 17 v. Vermont Supreme Court

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 24, 1990No. 90-102PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

On January 11,1990, this Court issued Administrative Directive No. 17, which stated as follows:

The resources available to the Judiciary have been drastically reduced for the remainder of the fiscal year 1990. Accordingly, each superior and district court judge and clerk is hereby ordered to postpone until after July 1,1990 any civil jury case for which the jury has not yet been drawn.

The administrative judge is hereby authorized to permit the trial of any given case where justice requires, but it is envisioned that nearly all civil jury cases will be delayed.

Plaintiffs are litigants whose…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Martin-Trigona v. LavienDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
  4. Ex Parte FarleyKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Morgenthau v. CookeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Secretary, Agency of Natural Resources v. Upper Valley Regional Landfill Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme CourtArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. South East Coal Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  4. New York State Ass'n of Criminal Defense Lawyers v. KayeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API