Legal Opinion
State v. Therrien
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 24, 1993No. 92-477PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
This proceeding began with a complaint filed in the Orleans Superior Court by the State of Vermont against Andrew Therrien charging him with violating Act 250, 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6108, and the Consumer Fraud Act, 9 V.S.A. §§ 2451-2462, in connection with his Salem Heights development in the Town of Derby. Andrew Therrien died after trial but before judgment was entered against him. His wife Carolyn was substituted as defendant, in her capacity as executrix and distributee of the estate of her husband. The estate also became a defendant. The court then issued its August 10,1992 judgment nunc…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John K. McClellan Thomas Ratliff, Individually and as Sometime Commonwealth Attorney for Pike County KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Johnson v. Hinds CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Grenafege v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Boyden v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Carter v. GugliuzziSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Town of Killington v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Elkins v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. GibneySupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Breeden v. HueserMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.