San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Rodney T.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDonald, J.
These appeals arise from the court’s application of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (the Act) (Earn. Code, § 3400 et seq.)1 during a Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 (hereafter section 300) proceeding on behalf of seven-year-old C. T. C.’s parents, Rodney T. and Leslie M., separately appeal the court’s order placing C. with Leslie and terminating its dependency jurisdiction over C. Rodney contends the true finding that C. is a person described by section 300 and the order placing C. with Leslie must be reversed because they are findings…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Kumar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Tsemetzin v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Roberts v. District Court of Larimer Cty.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Tenenbaum v. SprecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Harshberger v. HarshbergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Interest of Nc and Am, Minor Children, Sc and Fc, Iii v. State of Wyoming, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Angela H.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Sareen v. SareenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Ruff v. KnickerbockerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.