Haken v. Harper Oil Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.
The decisive question here is whether or not the trial court’s decree — requiring lessees under an oil and gas lease to develop within 180 days or suffer cancellation of the lease — is clearly against the weight of the evidence.
I
The dispute was submitted to the court for decision based upon stipulated facts. Lessor owns a quarter section of land in Garfield County. On February 27, 1976, that section became the subject of an oil and gas lease — apparently a producer’s 88 executed form — in favor of Harper Oil Co. *1229for a primary term of three years. Apparently, Harper sought…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eastern Oil Co. v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. GinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Broswood Oil & Gas Co. v. Mary Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Dixon v. Anadarko Production CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fransen v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Ruth Fransen v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Thoroughbred Assoc. v. Kansas Royalty Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2011