Legal Opinion

Krom v. City of Antigo

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

All parties concede that the action of the board of review in increasing the assessment made by the assessor upon the improvements from $20,000 to $25,000 was void, and that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount levied on account of such increase of $5,000. Upon the findings the court adjudged:

“That the assessment in question so far as the excess of $7,500 is involved, together with the tax based thereon, amounting to $307.50, are illegal, arbitrary, excessive, discriminatory, and unjust; and that the plaintiff should recover such unlawful portion with interest thereon at six per…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fifield v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hixon v. Oneida CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Wells v. Western Paving & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Day v. Town of PelicanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Parkes v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marina Fontana v. Village of Fontana-On-Geneva LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Barker Lumber Co. v. Village of Genoa CityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Highlander Co. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API