Legal Opinion
Krom v. City of Antigo
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
All parties concede that the action of the board of review in increasing the assessment made by the assessor upon the improvements from $20,000 to $25,000 was void, and that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount levied on account of such increase of $5,000. Upon the findings the court adjudged:
“That the assessment in question so far as the excess of $7,500 is involved, together with the tax based thereon, amounting to $307.50, are illegal, arbitrary, excessive, discriminatory, and unjust; and that the plaintiff should recover such unlawful portion with interest thereon at six per…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fifield v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Hixon v. Oneida CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Wells v. Western Paving & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Day v. Town of PelicanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Parkes v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marina Fontana v. Village of Fontana-On-Geneva LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Barker Lumber Co. v. Village of Genoa CityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Highlander Co. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946