Legal Opinion

Fifield v. Marinette County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1885PublishedCited by 33 opinions

APPEALS from the Circuit Court for Marmette County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

These actions were commenced by the respondents for the purpose of setting aside certain tax certificates issued to the county upon sales of the respondents’ lands for the nonpayment of taxes assessed thereon. The com*533plaints are alike in each case. There was no appearance of the appellant in either case, and judgment was entered in each case declaring all the tax certificates null and void, canceling the same, and perpetually enjoining the county from selling, assigning, or in any manner disposing of said certificates to any person or persons whatsoever, except that they may be delivered to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Weeks v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Mills v. CharletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Marsh v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Mills v. GleasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Warden v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Farrington v. New England Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Brink v. DannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hayes v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hixon v. Oneida CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API