Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Woodstock

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 8, 1974No. 72-154PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

From an order enjoining further operations of a sewage treatment plant and the construction of a proposed storm drain, the defendant appeals contending that the trial court abused its discretion.

The sewage treatment plant, located upstream from plaintiffs properties, began operating on August 4, 1971. Its treated effluents discharge directly into the Kishwaukee River, a natural watercourse which runs through the premises in question. On September 29, 1971, plaintiffs filed their complaint for injunction.

Evidence adduced at trial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Peck v. HerringtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Bondy v. SamuelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lloyd v. Catlin Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Haack v. Lindsay Light & Chemical Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Newell v. SassIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Van Meter v. Darien Park Dist.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Okaw Drainage District of Champaign and Douglas County, Illinois v. National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Hild v. Avland Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Drainage District 1 in Sand Prairie Township v. Village of Green ValleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Village of Wilsonville v. SCA Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API