Legal Opinion · Dissent

Quilter v. Voinovich

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 5, 1992No. 5:91CV-2219Published

1DissentDowd, District Judge

I respectfully dissent from that part of the Order which creates a limited period for candidates to file nominating petitions for the Ohio General Assembly.

First, I read the order of the Supreme Court of the United States staying this Court’s Orders of March 10, 1992 and March 31, 1992, coupled with the fact that the Supreme Court will review those orders, to divest this district court of jurisdiction with respect to the 1992 Ohio election for the General Assembly. The Court held in Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 103 S.Ct. 400, 74 *764L.Ed.2d 225 (1982), as a general…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. William Morris Jeanne Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Randal LongfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Samuelu Masalosalo, a Minor, by Paepae Masalosalo, His Mother and Guardian Ad Litem, and Paepae Masalosalo v. Stonewall Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Evans Transportation Company v. Scullin Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API