Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1999PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

We granted allocatur in this case to determine whether the trial court erred in ruling that the Commonwealth would be allowed to cross-examine defense character witnesses about their knowledge of allegations that Appellant Wesley Morgan had molested other children in the 1970s. For the reasons discussed below, we find that the trial court erred and accordingly, reverse.

On March 17, 1994, Appellant was charged with involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault, indecent exposure and related offenses. The charges arose from Appellant’s sexual attacks against a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DowlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. TharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. KeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. ErvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. duPontSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API