Matter of Roth
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
This is an attorney-disciplinary matter. Respondent, Lee B. Roth, was found to have violated our ethics rules by attempting to obtain a real estate commission in a transaction in which he also served as the attorney for a prospective buyer of residential real estate. The case impels us to determine the appropriate ethics standards governing an attorney who undertakes to represent a client as both attorney and real estate broker in the same transaction.
The charges in this case were brought before the District XIII Ethics Committee (DEC), which found that respondent’s conduct in representing a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- In Re HindsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- New Jersey State Bar Ass'n v. New Jersey Ass'n of Realtor BoardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Matter of YaccarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- State v. GalatiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lovett v. Estate of LovettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Stewart Title of the Midwest, Inc. v. Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- MDC Investment Property, L.L.C. v. MarandoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Kanengiser v. KanengiserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- MATTER OF LaROSEESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.