Legal Opinion
Lovett v. Estate of Lovett
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 24, 1991PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
250 N.J. Super. 79 (1991)
593 A.2d 382
RICHARD R. LOVETT, III, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THE ESTATE OF RUTH K. LOVETT, ET AL., DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Atlantic County.
Decided January 24, 1991.
Lawrence T. Neher for Plaintiffs (Hannoch Weisman, attorneys).
Michael A. Orlando for Defendants Morgan Thomas and Thomas & Colaneri (Slimm, Dash and Goldberg, attorneys).
Edward Suski, Jr. for Defendants Morgan Thomas and Thomas & Colaneri on the counterclaim (Parker, McKay & Criscuolo, attorneys).
OPINION
GIBSON, J.S.C.
This is a legal malpractice action in which plaintiffs seek…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lieberman v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Albright v. BurnsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, a New Jersey Partnership in the Practice of LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Hoppe v. RanziniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Carlson v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Sommers v. McKinneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- In Re Estate of LashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Malik v. HannahDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Carbis Sales, Inc. v. EisenbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.