Jorgensen v. State National Bank & Trust Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
This appeal presents a question whether “retirement planners” are “professionals” within the meaning of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-222 (Reissue 1995). We conclude that the retirement planners in the instant case are not professionals and that they did not render professional services; therefore, we reverse, and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
State National Bank and Trust Company (Bank) was the custodian of Kenneth Jorgensen’s individual retirement account *242(IRA). Bank’s employees rendered certain advice to Jorgensen concerning his IRA that resulted in the disqualification of Jorgensen’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Witherspoon v. Sides Const. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Georgetowne Ltd. Partnership v. Geotechnical Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, Olsen, Schropp, Horn & Swartzbaugh, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Reinke Manufacturing Co. v. HayesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Bergan Mercy Health System v. HavenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Kratochvil v. Motor Club Ins. Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- ALEGENT HEALTH BERGAN MERCY MED. v. HaworthNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.