Legal Opinion

Jorgensen v. State National Bank & Trust Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1998No. S-97-297PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

This appeal presents a question whether “retirement planners” are “professionals” within the meaning of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-222 (Reissue 1995). We conclude that the retirement planners in the instant case are not professionals and that they did not render professional services; therefore, we reverse, and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

State National Bank and Trust Company (Bank) was the custodian of Kenneth Jorgensen’s individual retirement account *242(IRA). Bank’s employees rendered certain advice to Jorgensen concerning his IRA that resulted in the disqualification of Jorgensen’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Witherspoon v. Sides Const. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Georgetowne Ltd. Partnership v. Geotechnical Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Educational Service Unit No. 3 v. Mammel, Olsen, Schropp, Horn & Swartzbaugh, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Reinke Manufacturing Co. v. HayesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bergan Mercy Health System v. HavenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kratochvil v. Motor Club Ins. Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. ALEGENT HEALTH BERGAN MERCY MED. v. HaworthNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API