Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Francis

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 29, 1999No. C1-98-136PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court on Petitioners’ Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment based on ostensibly new evidence of Wilford Lee Berry’s incompetence. Because this Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain this claim, the Motion must be DENIED.

I. Procedural History

On July 3, 1990, a jury found Wilford Lee Berry guilty of aggravated murder, aggravated robbery and aggravated burglary in the death of Charles Mitroff. When the mitigation phase of Berry’s trial commenced on July 30, 1990, Berry’s counsel raised, for the first time, the issue of his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. James Yates Rust, Jr., A/K/A James Yeats Rust, Jr. v. Rex A. Zent, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Westside Mothers v. OlszewskiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  2. Benson v. AlexanderDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
  3. Phillips v. Correctional OfficersDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025
  4. Wilborn v. Criminal Justice CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API