Legal Opinion
McCrary v. Knox County
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided August 4, 2016No. 2:16-cv-00095-JMS-DKLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, United States District Judge
Presently pending before the Court in this action brought under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq. (“FCA”) and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Zane E. McCrary’s Complaint. [Filing No. 11.] For the reasons detailed herein, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. [Filing No. 11.]
I
Standard of Review
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) “requires only ‘a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.’ ” Erickson…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eder v. City of BurlesonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
- FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC v. JIM TRUE FORD MERCURY, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020