Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Kaplan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1996No. S96A0044PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Chief Justice.

Appellees, named executors of their father’s will, filed his will for probate. Appellant, who married the decedent in 1978, filed a caveat on the ground of mistake of fact under OCGA § 53-2-8. The probate court granted the executors’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.

OCGA § 53-2-8 1 provides a method for avoiding the consequences of a testator’s mistaken factual beliefs concerning the existence or conduct of an heir at law. Ms. Kaplan asserts that the mistake of fact in the present case was one concerning her conduct. She contends the testator was mistaken…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. Yara Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Thornton v. HulmeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. FlakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Shore v. MalloySupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API