Legal Opinion

Van Denburgh v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1934No. Civil No. 3491PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an original application for a writ of prohibition. The alternative writ was issued and the matter is before us on the return.

The facts material to a disposition of the case are as follows: Petitioner .is the duly qualified and acting-executor of the last will and testament of William David Rees. One Ida M. Pratt had presented to him a claim against the Rees estate, which he had disallowed, and in due time she brought suit thereon, as provided by statute. Tbe case was assigned to division 4 of the superior court of Maricopa county, which is presided over by Honorable J. C. Niles,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Capital City Water Co. v. State ex rel. MacdonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Kissler v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. McGill v. BeitnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Potter v. KearneyArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Union Iron Works v. Vekol Mining & Milling Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kiesel v. District Court of Sixth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Sevier CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Ream v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API