Union Iron Works v. Vekol Mining & Milling Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of tbe District Court of the Third Judicial District- in and for the County of Pinal. Edward Kent, Judge. The necessary facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
— This appeal is from an order of the 'district court dismissing the action because of the failure of the appellants, plaintiffs below, to file a cost bond, as required by the court. The abstract of record is defective, but from the original files of the case the following facts appear: The action was commenced October 6, 1900. On April 6, 1903, the defendants filed a motion for a rule requiring the plaintiffs to give security for costs, which was supported by an affidavit of one of the defendants that the plaintiffs are nonresidents of the territory. On May 11, 1903, the rule for costs was…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Van Denburgh v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Gerace v. BentleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015