Legal Opinion
Betty L. Kimmel v. State of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 9, 2017No. 36Published
1Opinion of the Court
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 36 Betty L. Kimmel, Respondent, v. State of New York et al., Appellants. -------------------------------- Emmelyn Logan-Baldwin, Interested Party-Respondent. Mitchell J. Banas, Jr., for appellants. A. Vincent Buzard, for respondents Kimmel and Logan-Baldwin. Empire Justice Center et al.; Legal Services of Central New York, amici curiae. DiFIORE, Chief Judge: Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (CPLR article 86; hereinafter…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Vucetovic v. Epsom DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.