Legal Opinion

Carr v. Maxwell Trading Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1909No. 97PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Murray County Court; Harry W. Fielding, Judge. Action by the Maxwell Trading Company against D. II. Carr and I. J. Whitsett. Judgment against defendant Carr, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKaNE, C. J.

This was a suit on an open account, brought by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error and I. J. Whitsett, who were defendants below. After the commencement of the case, it was dismissed against Whitsett, and defendant Carr answered to the effect that, if he was indebted to the plaintiff at all, it was only as guarantor for Whitsett in the sum of $115; “that, when notified by plaintiff’s agent, that the firm had advanced the defendant I. J. Whitsett to the amount of, to-wit, $100, this defendant then and there declared to such agent that if the firm was…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. McIver v. KatsiolisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Town of Sentinel v. BoggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Squires v. Wesco Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. ElledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Bronough v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API