Legal Opinion
Exxon Corp. v. Allsup
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided May 16, 1991No. 13-90-127-CVPublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
This is a suit for tortious interference with a contractual or business relationship and for tortious interference with a prospective employment relationship. The jury found that appellant, Exxon Corporation (Exxon) interfered with a contractual or business relationship between appellee Robert Allsup and King Ranch, Incorporated (King Ranch), and that Exxon negligently and with malice “handled” Allsup’s employment relationship. The jury awarded Allsup $315,687.82 in actual and punitive damages. Exxon asserts twenty-nine points of error. As modified, we affirm the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Alcatel Usa, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dgi Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
- Knox v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.