Legal Opinion

State v. Omey

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1987No. 16481PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Rule 35, I.C.R., authorizes a convicted felon to seek a reduction of sentence within 120 days after the sentence is imposed. Today we must decide whether a Rule 35 motion may be filed more than 120 days after a sentence is pronounced and suspended, but less than 120 days after the sentence is ordered into effect upon revocation of probation. For reasons explained below, we hold that such a motion is untimely.

The issue is framed by the following facts. Richard Omey pled guilty to a charge of aggravated assault upon a law enforcement officer. The district judge pronounced a ten-year…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Glenn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. State v. SalsgiverIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. ParrishIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SuttonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. KnutsenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. CorderIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. FoxIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. AlvaradoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API