Legal Opinion
In Re Dick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 31, 1933No. 23134PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This action involves an accusation filed against R. M. Dick, respondent, herein, a member of the State Bar of Oklahoma, filed before the administrative committee for section 21 of the State Bar of Oklahoma. The charge is as follows:
“The said R. M. Dick has been guilty of the violation of the oath taken by him upon his admission to the Bar of the state of Oklahoma, and has been guilty of a willful violation of the duties of an attorney and counsellor, and has been guilty of such course of conduct as is calculated to render him an unfit, unsafe, and untrustworthy person to be entrusted with the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Shirk v. NeibleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Elmore v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Felton v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re UlmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Haunstein v. State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935