Legal Opinion

The Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company v. Estate of Jefffrey Rolison

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 2021No. 3:17-cv-00762Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE PROCTER & GAMBLE U.S. BUSINESS: SERVICES COMPANY, as Plan Administrator : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-762 and on Behalf of THE PROCTER & GAMBLE: (JUDGE MARIANI) PROFIT SHARING TRUST AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN and THE PROCTER & GAMBLE SAVINGS PLAN, : Plaintiff, Vv. ESTATE OF JEFFREY ROLISON, Deceased, MARGARET M. LOSINGER, : and MARY LOU MURRAY, : Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Two motions are pending before the Court in the above-captioned matter: Defendant Estate of Jeffrey Rolison’s Motion to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. Herbert Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API