Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Willan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1901No. 10,677PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ames, O.

This is an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The facts, to the extent that a recital of them is deemed requisite for the purpose of this opinion, are disclosed, practically without dispute, in the record, as follows : The plaintiff in error had in its possession certain notes executed to it by the defendant in error and another, and from whi ch it was contended by the defendant in .error that he had, for a valuable consideration, been released, by an agreement between the parties, and upon which, otherwise, an action ivas barred by the statute of limitations. Well…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kolka v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Lipscomb v. ShofnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bickel v. MacKieDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1978
  2. Deshawn Gervin v. Pamela FlorenceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
  3. O'TOOLE v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Abbott v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Trute v. HoldenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API