Legal Opinion
Sarty v. Millburn Tp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 6, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
28 N.J. Super. 199 (1953)
100 A.2d 309
LLOYD A. SARTY, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN, ETC., ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 2, 1953.
Decided November 6, 1953.
Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.
Mr. Reynier J. Wortendyke, Jr., argued the cause for defendants-appellants.
Mr. Harrison F. Durand and Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Soons & Durand, attorneys; Mr. Doane Twombly, of counsel).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.
Defendants, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- GEORGE VAN TASSEL'S, ETC. v. Town of BloomfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Atlantic City v. GroffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Schmidt v. SpaethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- River Edge Homes, Inc. v. Borough of River EdgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Borough of Spring Lake v. PolakNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Velasco v. Goldman Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- State v. BirchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Koch v. Borough of Seaside HeightsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Spiegle v. BOR. OF BEACH HAVENNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Watson v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.