Purdum v. Purdum
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1ConcurrenceBruns, J.
I concur in-the majority opinion but write separately to explain why I believe tire church autonomy doctrine—also known as ecclesiastical abstention—is applicable in this case. Undoubtedly, this is a difficult question and I sincerely respect the opinions expressed by bodr of my colleagues. Nevertheless, I believe that under die unique facts presented in tíiis defamation case—which arises out of an annulment proceeding filed in the Roman Catholic Church—we must decline to exercise subject matter jurisdiction out of respect for church autonomy. To do otherwise would excessively entangle the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kedroff v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church in North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.