Sweeney v. Neely
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Marquette. (Grant, J.) Accounting. Complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
Bill for dissolving partnership and for an accounting. The parties were partners engaged for a time in exploring for and mining ore upon leased land in which they had the exclusive right for fifteen years. They entered upon said land, known as Hematite mine, and carried on their mining business from May 1, 1879, until June, 1880, dui’ing which period they mined and shipped away large quantities of ore. Complainant claims that subsequently they sold the mine. Defendant, however, denies this sale was made before suit brought. The partnership was to continue during the pleasure of the parties,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dexter v. ArnoldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1823
- Day v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
- Gilman v. VaughanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by9 opinions
- Creason v. HardingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Fitzpatrick v. RitzenheinMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Township of Royal Oak v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Munroe, Boyce & Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Dawson, Corbett & Shelp v. Lieurance & Canfield Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.