Home Builders v. Board of County Commissioners
Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS KAPNER, Circuit Judge.
This matter is presented upon a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs contend that Ordinance 79-7 (Fairshare Ordinance), *83which imposes an “impact fee.” on new development for the purpose of financing proposed new road construction, is invalid. Plaintiffs contend that this “fee”1 is not a fee at all but is in reality a tax and is therefore invalid.
The court has considered the evidence and law, all of which has been ably presented by counsel, and concludes that the “fee” is in fact a fee and is therefore valid. The pertinent facts are as follows:
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lainhart v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Contractors & Builders Ass'n v. City of DunedinSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Jordan v. Village of Menomonee FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- City of St. Petersburg v. Briley, Wild & Assoc., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.