Legal Opinion

Cashvan v. Darling

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 7, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

By this declaratory judgment action and the counterclaims of certain individual defendants the court is required to *572determine whether certain land is subject to restrictions of a type which would prevent plaintiff from using the land for the erection of so-called garden type apartments.

On September 4, 1953, plaintiff Hyman Cashvan entered into a contract with one of the defendants, J. Frank Darling, whereby plaintiff agreed to purchase from Darling all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of defendant Castle Construction Co. (called “Castle”), of Glen Homes Co.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Radio Corp. of America v. Philadelphia Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. Coughlin v. BarkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Wilmington Housing Authority v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1946
  4. Skinner v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Welshire, Inc. v. HarbisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cashvan v. DarlingCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
  2. Carey v. Shellburne, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
  3. Carey v. Shellburne, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API