Brown v. Winne
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion. Division (No. 2. Hru>r from District Court, Ouster County. A'-tion between John Winne and P. J. Mul-taren and .1. R. Brown. Demurrer to cross-peiifion .of .1. R. Brown sustained, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LYONS, C.
Winne and Multaren, cwo of the defendants in error, sued Jones to recover the sum of $1,002 held by him as a stakeholder. Jones answered, admitting the possession of said sum, but stating that one J. R. Brown also claimed to be the owner of said money, and that said money was a part of (he proceeds of certain drilling rigs in which Winne and Multaren and J. R; Brown each had an interest.. Brown thereupon filed his answer and cross-petition, in .which he claimed the said sum of $1,062. as his property by reason of certain transactions between him and Winne and Multaren,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baughman v. HebardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bartlett v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Sphier v. MichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1924