Legal Opinion

State v. Hudson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Justice.

We granted the state’s application for permission to appeal in this case in order to review the validity of a search warrant issued by a federal magistrate and executed in compliance with federal law, but not in compliance with state law. Specifically, the warrant was executed six days after it was issued, beyond the five-day limit provided both in Rule 41(d) of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure and in T.C.A. § 40-6-107. The parallel federal rule, Fed. R.Crim.P. 41, permits up to ten days for valid execution, and the federal magistrate who issued the warrant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. State v. JacuminTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. MollicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stein v. Davidson Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. ZirkleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. State v. CauleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. Sobczak-ObettsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. People v. Sobczak-ObettsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API