Legal Opinion

Ætna Ins. v. C. I. T. Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1934No. 7520PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Three insurance companies are appellants. Each issued a policy for its proportionate part of $9,900 concurrent insurance permitted Coleman on gin buildings and machinery. Each stood in the same case as to defenses below. Each makes common cause on this appeal. The insurance written was:

$1600 on two-story, frame, iron-clad gin building, including boiler room, engine room, sheds and platforms, if attached thereto.

$4500 on all machinery described in said policy.

$1500 on gasoline engine as described in said policy.

$ 400 on motors, dynamos, Deleo, and other electric…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. ætna Ins. Co. v. Houston Oil & Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  2. Camden Fire Insurance v. Harold E. Clayton & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. BendyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Bennett v. Cosmopolitan Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  5. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armada Supply Inc. v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Standard Fire Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Armada Supply Incorporated v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Standard Fire Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API