Legal Opinion
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Reinholtz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 5, 1998No. 86623Published
1Opinion of the Court
955 P.2d 223 (1998)
1998 OK 11
WAL-MART STORES, INC., and National Union Fire Insurance, Petitioners,
v.
Terri L. REINHOLTZ, and the Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents.
No. 86623.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
February 3, 1998.
Dissenting Opinion Corrected February 5, 1998.
Brian R. Berry, Jody Nathan, Tulsa, for Petitioner.
Jerry V. Beavin, Oklahoma City, on the briefs, for Petitioner.
J.L. Franks, Kathryn Burgy, Tulsa, for Respondents.
SIMMS, Justice:
¶ 1 This case concerns the workers' compensation claim of Terri Reinholtz for disability based on psychological overlay.
¶ 2 Claimant, a Wal-Mart…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- City of Richmond v. BraxtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.