Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Meekins v. Ford Motor Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 5, 1997No. C.A. 94C-04-028PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Resident Judge.

BACKGROUND

This is a case based on a claim for an enhanced injury as the result of an automobile accident. Plaintiff has filed a motion in limine to exclude the trial testimony of an accident reconstruction expert hired by the defendant who will offer testimony regarding plaintiffs negligence in causing the accident and the dynamics of the resulting injury which plaintiff claims to have sustained.

The automobile which the plaintiff Barry Meekins was driving collided with another vehicle at an interseetional collision. The air bag installed in Meekins’ Lincoln Towncar…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Reed v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Whitehead v. Toyota Motor Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. LaHue v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. D'AMARIO v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Harsh v. PetrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Donze v. General Motors, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. Dannenfelser v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2005
  5. Bravo v. Ford Motor Company, No. Cv-00-0594807 (Apr. 16, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API