Legal Opinion
Dannenfelser v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided March 31, 2005No. 1:04-cr-00235PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DAIM-LERCHRYSLER’S SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE; ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE THE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS RAISED FOR THE FIRST TIME IN PLAINTIFF’S REPLY
EZRA, Chief Judge.
The Court heard Plaintiffs Motion on March 28, 2005. John P. Manaut, Esq., appeared at the hearing on behalf of Plaintiff; Richard F. Nakamura, Esq., and David K. Schultz, Esq., appeared at the hearing on behalf of Defendant. After reviewing the motions and the supporting and opposing memoranda, the Court GRANTS IN PART…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reid v. BerkowitzColorado Court of Appeals · 2013