Smith v. State

The fact that the venire contained the name of “David M. Mison” and that “David M. Mixon” was summoned, and that it also contained the names of two persons who had participated in a former trial of the case, afforded no ground for quashing the same, and the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion to quash said venire. Harris v. State, 203 Ala. 200, 82 South. 450; Reed v. State, 18 Ala. App. 371, 92 South. 513; Acts 1909, p. 317. § 29; Acts 1919, p. 1042.

Dr. Crook had testified as to the nature and character of the wound, had been interrogated as to whether death was the…