Legal Opinion

State v. Nearing

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1986No. 8407 1540m; A36291PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, P. J., Pro Tempore

Defendant, one of those whose conviction for disorderly conduct was affirmed in State v. Heath, 75 Or App 425, 706 P2d 598 (1985), appeals from a trial court order finding her to be in violation of a special condition of the probation imposed in that case. The trial court extended her probation and added conditions to it. We reverse.

The special condition defendant was found to have violated in the present case is one forbidding her to enter the Pyramid Creek area — the area in which her environmental activist activities led to her conviction. In State v. Heath,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HovaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MaackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API