Legal Opinion

Central Soya Co. v. Bundrick

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1975No. 50930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

Is appellant, Central Soya Company, Inc., entitled to priority over other claimant creditors (appellees) in the instant receivership fund as a matter of law by reason of holding a perfected security interest under the U.C.C. in the assets from which the fund was produced? Inasmuch as this question involved neither equitable relief nor application of any rule of equitable procedure, jurisdiction of this appeal was transferred to this court. Central Soya Co. v. Bundrick, 234 Ga. 133 (214 SE2d 556).

"It is easy to get totally lost in the morass of petitions, orders, motions,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Saunders v. VikersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Stephens County v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. MAXEY-BOSSHARDT LUMBER CO. INC. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Leachman v. Cobb Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. State Housecraft, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Van Bibber v. NorrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. Robert D. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Farm Credit of Northwest Florida v. Easom Peanut Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Graniteville Co. v. Bleckley Lumber Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1988
  5. Hatcher v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API