Legal Opinion

Karp v. Cooley

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided October 18, 1972No. Civ. A. 71-H-369PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SINGLETON, District Judge.

After nine days of trial in the above-captioned malpractice suit based on diversity jurisdiction, the joint motion of defendants Cooley and Liotta for a directed verdict was granted. Fed.R.Civ. P. 50(a). The granting of said directed verdict is based on the following facts and conclusions.

Haskell Karp had a medical history revealing past coronary problems. He had scarlet fever at the age of fifteen. In 1959, at the age of thirty-seven, he had his first heart attack and was hospitalized approximately two months because of diffuse anterior myocardial infarction.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hart v. Van ZandtTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  5. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Russell T. Fitzgerald v. Preston C. Manning, Jr., M. D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. Gravis v. Parke-Davis & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Shirley Karp, Individually, Etc. v. Denton A. Cooley and Domingo S. LiottaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. George B. Dickinson v. Auto Center Manufacturing Co., a Florida Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API