Stephenson v. Perlitz
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Justice.
The question is, Does a restrictive covenant in a deed providing that “[a]ll im*787provements to be erected upon the premises hereby conveyed shall be built and used for residence purposes . . . [and] [o]nly one residence shall be erected upon the premises hereby conveyed” prohibit the erection of a duplex or two-unit dwelling thereon? We answer the question in the negative for the reasons now to be stated.
All parties own lots in Block 3 of Edge-mont Addition in the City of Austin, there being many costly and well-kept single family homes therein including those of the plaintiffs.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MacDonald v. PainterTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Green v. GernerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Bear v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Green v. GernerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Sporn v. OverholtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Southwick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Stephenson v. PerlitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Witty v. American General Capital Distributors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Stephenson v. PerlitzTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Southwick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.