Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Perlitz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1975No. 7706PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

The question is, Does a restrictive covenant in a deed providing that “[a]ll im*787provements to be erected upon the premises hereby conveyed shall be built and used for residence purposes . . . [and] [o]nly one residence shall be erected upon the premises hereby conveyed” prohibit the erection of a duplex or two-unit dwelling thereon? We answer the question in the negative for the reasons now to be stated.

All parties own lots in Block 3 of Edge-mont Addition in the City of Austin, there being many costly and well-kept single family homes therein including those of the plaintiffs.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. PainterTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Green v. GernerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Bear v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Green v. GernerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Sporn v. OverholtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southwick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  2. Stephenson v. PerlitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Witty v. American General Capital Distributors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  4. Stephenson v. PerlitzTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Southwick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API