United States v. Richard E. Wall
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PICKERING, Circuit Judge:
Before the court is the government’s appeal from the district court’s order granting defendant Richard Wall’s Fed. R.Crim.P. 33 motion for a new trial. We conclude that the district court abused its discretion when it granted the motion.
I. Facts and Proceedings
Wall was indicted on charges of conspiracy involving a scheme to defraud the state of Louisiana of the proper quality of steel for use in Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LA-DOTD) road construction projects. Wall was the regional sales manager for Inland Steel Company. He was charged with…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- Mesarosh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- State v. HerndonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- United States v. Joseph EbronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. MunozCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.