Legal Opinion

Weiboldt v. Standard Fashion Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 26, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, on a written contract. Trial in the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. C. W. Raymond, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears

The only question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of the trial court. We can not pass upon the rulings of the court in holding or refusing to hold propositions of law presented, because the propositions of law were presented too late, and after the issues had been determined and judgment rendered.

Propositions of law will not be reviewed for error by an appellate court when the holding or refusal of them could in no way have guided the trial court in- reaching its conclusions,as, when they are submitted only after finding and judgment. Allman v. Lumsden, 159…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. RounsavellIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Buchanan v. International BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Allman v. LumsdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Burch v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Independent Gas & Oil Co. v. T. B. Smith Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Platt v. National Ass'n of Retail DruggistsIllinois Circuit Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API