Legal Opinion · Dissent

Morton v. Hayden

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 6, 1958Published

1DissentDubord, J.

(Dissenting opinion.)

I am unable to agree with my associates. My opinion is that the petitioner was illegally sentenced and is entitled to be enlarged from his confinement in the reformatory for men.

The petitioner was between the ages of 16 and 17 years when he was arraigned in the municipal court, sitting as a juvenile court, upon the charge of having feloniously uttered and published as true a false, forged and counterfeit instrument. Upon trial, he was found guilty of juvenile *19delinquency and committed to the reformatory for men. He filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farris ex rel. Dorsky v. GossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  2. State v. FredericksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  3. Craughwell v. Mousam River Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
  4. State v. J. P. Bass Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  5. Lander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API