Legal Opinion
Fontanez v. Pullen
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 18, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01168Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JOSE FONTANEZ, ) 3:22cv1168 (SVN) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) WARDEN TIMETHEA PULLEN, ) Respondent. ) August 18, 2023 RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 2241
Petitioner Jose Fontanez is a sentenced federal inmate in custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) at FCI-Danbury. Pet., ECF No. 1. Petitioner has filed for a writ of habeas corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2241
challenging an adverse disciplinary decision on grounds that the decision was made in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s procedural due process guarantees…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.