Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alberic H. Ouelette, D/B/A Sandy Point Beach and Restaurant v. Mary F. Champagne

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 4, 1961No. 5838Published

1DissentAldrich, Circuit Judge

Although the consequences disturb me, I reluctantly accept it as the law of New Hampshire that a jury can be permitted to find that a slope of one quarter of an inch in two feet, described by that court as “imperceptible to the eye,” Steeves v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co., 1942, 92 N.H. 52, 54, 24 A.2d 606, 608, can contribute to making premises unsafe. I do not follow the reasoning that since a much larger slope could readily be found to do this, the difference “is only in degree.” Almost all differences are in degree. This does not free courts from the duty of making a decision.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Philadelphia Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. Jennings v. TompkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. SkermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  4. Steeves v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API