Steeves v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
I. The plaintiff discovered on the morning of the trial some indications of unevenness in the floor, but only by the use of a level. The denial of the motion to amend, made after the trial began, was within the discretion of the trial court, and it does not clearly appear that the exercise of discretion was erroneous. No question of law is raised. Piper v. Hilliard, 58 N. H. 198; Lyons v. Child, 61 N. H. 72.
II. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the submission of the case to the jury may be discussed in two branches.(1) Would the evidence of unevenness in the floor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harlow v. LeclairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Lavigne v. NelsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Lyons v. ChildSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
- Piper v. HilliardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1877
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson v. Manchester Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
- Alberic H. Ouelette, D/B/A Sandy Point Beach and Restaurant v. Mary F. ChampagneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Alberic H. Ouelette, D/B/A Sandy Point Beach and Restaurant v. Mary F. ChampagneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Alberic H. Ouelette, D/B/A Sandy Point Beach and Restaurant v. Mary F. ChampagneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961