Legal Opinion

United States v. Schneiderman

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 11, 1951No. 21883 and 21940PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

It is charged in the indictment in each of these cases that the defendants conspired to commit offenses against the United States. 18 U.S.C. § 371. The offenses which the defendants stand accused of conspiring to commit are violations of the Smith Act. 54 Stat. 670 (1940); 18 U.S.C. (1946 ed.) § 10; 18 U.S.C. (1948 ed.) § 2385.

The material portions of the specific charges as laid in the indictments are in these words: “From and on or about April 1, 1945, and continuously thereafter up to and including the date of the filing of this indictment, in the. Southern District…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  2. United States v. FlynnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  3. United States v. FujimotoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1952
  4. Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. BlevensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API