Legal Opinion

Poteat v. Poteat

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1982No. 44251PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Hanover Insurance Company (inter-venor) intervened in this dissolution of marriage action as a judgment creditor of the husband, alleging in its Intervening Petition:

[A]n interest in seeing that E. Eugene Poteat [husband] is awarded his fair share of the marital property, and in seeing that all of the marital property is not awarded to Helen Poteat [wife], because this would result in defeating its rights to collect its judgment of record against E. Eugene Poteat out of his fair share of the marital assets.

As the husband disappeared just two days before his Petition for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of TrappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Farmers Mutuals Automobile Insurance v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Harding v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Stone v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nielson v. ThompsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Olsen v. OlsenWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Zahorsky v. Barr, Glynn and Morris, PCMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Brown v. Greene CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Barrup v. BarrupSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API